Personal Accomplishment and Management †MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about the Personal Accomplishment and Management. Answer: Introduction Teamwork is considered to be an essential aspect of any organization and team dynamics tends to play a huge role in determining the success of the organization. On the other hand with the advent of technology, basic up gradations have been made in all organizations, however certain organization members often find it difficult to cope up with the same. For this purpose, a critical analysis of the theory will be made. The primary objective of the given essay is to relate incidents based on personal experience and relate hem to respective theories. After relating them to relevant theories and models, an analysis of the implications will be made and recommendations as to how it can be improved will be made. The aspects which have been chosen for the given analysis are teamwork and technological change at work. The essay follows a systematic structure whereby the concepts of Team work and technology at the workplace have been explained. This is followed by a personal reflection on the given topic relating to my own experience (Buckingham Goodall, 2015). The experiences I have gained in the organization have been explained and the shortcomings of them based on the related theories have been made. The theories have been compared to a real life experience, which is then followed by recommendations on the same. Team work can be defined as an effort which is generally made by a team in order to achieve the goals or to perform a particular task in an effective manner. A team can be described as a group of individuals working together towards a common purpose. Effective team can build with an adequate number of team members and resources which are essential for the development of the ram such as space and time, an efficient supervisor, support from the top management. It is very important for a team to have its goals clear and the roles within a team well defined so that there are no problems with respect to the achievement of the tasks. Teamwork can be present in any context and in any organization. It just needs to involve a group of people who work for the achievement of a particular objective. Teamwork can be present in various contexts such as an industrial organization, sports team, healthcare system and other references (Cascio, 2018). Effective team work is not an easy concept. In order to achieve an effective teamwork, there are certain characteristics that need to be present so that the teamwork becomes successful. First of all there needs to be a higher level of interdependence among all the team members so that there is no communication gap between the given members. This helps in developing the team dynamics which helps in achievement of goals. Sharing leadership positions also form an essential aspect of the teamwork present (Chesley, 2014) this gives rise to a feeling of shred responsibility. Personal experience related to Teamwork When I was interning at Samsung for my summer internship I was placed under the sales team of the company and was required to help the team in generating sufficient sales for the organization. For this purpose, I was supposed to help the existing team and guide them in effective decision making of the market and help them to maintain a database of the customers. We were required to make the sales in the various posh areas of Singapore. As I was an intern, I was required not to make any sales but to observe how team work could contribute to an effective completion of the goals. There were 5 members in our team with 2 female and 3 males. All the team members were aged below 30. All of us were under a supervisor, Mr. Chang who would review our daily performance. The normal schedule of a team involved, meeting at the head office at 9am in the morning and updating the supervisor of our progress. The supervisors would then assign us the tasks for the respective day. All of us were judged on team work and not on the basis of individual performance. This required us to work together efficiently and to see to it that the communication between the various team members was clear (Joshi Knight, 2015). However, in actual experience, this was not the case. The different team members in the team were of varied backgrounds and because of this they often did not agree with one another. The members of the team wanted to work on their own convenience and timings which made it impossible for the other team members to function properly. When I joined the team there was no introductory session, for this reason I found the team members, particularly very rude and disinterested. This completely changed my image of the team and I began to believe that the team was following the basic norms of teamwork. Secondly, there existed a lack of coordination among the different team members. The members of the team were not concerned about receiving group targets but were concerned about achieving individual targets. It could be stated that the team work for the team could be better if proper model group development had been applied and had been present. As per my readings, the most popular theory based on teamwork is the Tuckman`s Stages of Group development. It was first developed in 1965 and is an effective model for measuring the effective team building stages. The given model by Tuchman states that a team cannot become successful from the very beginning but they develop over time. There are set defined stages which every group must go through before development and achievement of team targets. No team starts exceptionally well but tends to develop over time. In the forming stage, the team is comparatively new and the individuals have not been able to gel well with one another. All the members of the team are engaged in figuring out the main purpose of the team. In my group during the internship, this stage took place at the beginning of the team formation where all the members were new and were trying to fit in. Various team building techniques and teamwork tips come useful in the given scenario. However, according o my observation, my team did not undergo an effective team formation and the members by the end of the period will still not aware of one another and that lead to a sense of formality in the team. The storming stage forms the second stage of group formation whereby the members begin to challenge one another and arguments start taking place regarding the duties and responsibilities. By the end of this stage, any one person generally emerges as a leader. This stage often leads to a loss of performance or focus. In our team, there existed difference of opinion with respect to the areas to be covered and the tasks assigned. However, these arguments were difficult to resolve and this resulted in the loss of a team member. The third stage is the stage of norming whereby the different parties to the group start working with one another. Although the group I was working with entered to this stage, we never got beyond the initial version of the stage. The team members were not willing to work with one another and this lead to disagreement from various members. I believe that there was a lack of cohesion among the members and all of them were not comfortable with one another. As stated earlier the team I was working with never got to this stage. Due to the schedule constraints of the various members and the unwillingness to work in a tangent, the team was unable to achieve success and the performance could be termed as poor (Grint Woolgar, 2013). We had been appointed as a team to improve our performance overall, however we were unable to do so and bought a bad name to the supervisor as well. This is often described as the last stage of team development and the most essential one. As per my observation, my team was not able to successfully perform in any of the stages due to the perspective and behaviour of the different team members. According to me, the supervisor should have engaged in a team building session. Team building sessions are considered to act as an essential part of the team development strategy. It was the duty of the supervisor of our group at Samsung to see to it that the various members of the team perform effectively. Secondly, I believe that there should have been scheduled meetings. They were to see to it that the different members of the organization were performing well and this demanded them to arrange for regular meetings (Islam, 2014).Thirdly I believe that providing incentives would have worked fine. If different individuals and team members were provided with incentives for the performance or the sales, they would have performed better. There was no incentive present in our team which led to problems with motivation. Lastly, according to me celebrating wins is important. The small wins need to be celebrated. In our team, the small wins were not celebrated adequately and this lead to pr oblems with motivation. With the advent of technology, digital tools have changed the manner in which organizations perform their operations. On a macro level a shift in the technology has changed the manner in which a company functions and has been successful in altering the processes in an organization. These technological advancements and innovation have been developed to increase the work productivity in future. Technology makes the work smarter and it improves the existing communication tools in an n organizations. Although technology has been bliss, the complete shift in the manner in which employees spend their time at work has undergone a complete change and the workers spend more time on social networking sites which have bought down the productivity. However, technology at work has also created opportunities of precision, connection and creativity which make the employees more efficient at doing their jobs. Basic tasks at work like meetings have been automated which leaves more time for the actual work. Collaboration and coordination has also maximized at the workplace due to technology advancements at workplace. Using various chat apps, business specific networks, and email tools has helped the company to serve their customers and employees well. However, not everyone is accustomed to the modern methods of technology and this often results in failure of work performance (DePasse Lee, 2013) Employees often reflect resistance to work in cases where they do not know how to handle a given situation. This leads to increased costs for the firm and problems relating to a dip in the work productivity due to the increased time spent in learning. This experience relates to the time I was interning at an organization ABC limited. The organization is a small company which provides postal services to the customers. This incident relates to 5 years back and when I initially joined the organization, the firm was still maintaining all records on books. This was convenient for them as the employees were mostly middle aged and did not bother to adopt the new technology. However as the technology advanced and the new owner took over, the whole work process at the firm was changed. I was hired to look over the change and help the employees adapting the change. However, the new process involved all the employees to work on a particular database. This database would keep a track of all the deliveries and also ensure that the processes were recorded online. The very beginning of the supply chain would begin by an entrance on the database and the delivery which is marked there would be done at the end. In order to ensure that the performance of the employees can be managed well, each employee was required to log in and communicate using Emails and chats. They were required to send a report to their immediate head defining the work of the day. The employees working in the organization were not accustomed to this advanced technology and faced resistance at workplace. According to me, some of the employees were fast but a majority of them were slow. Due to this, innovation cannot develop that strongly because according to my observation the different members were not able to climb up the Roger`s model of innovation. Innovation Adoption Model Curve The given model aims to understand how an organization would adapt to a given change in the organization and how certain individuals are open to changes whereas some are not. The Roger`s model classifies the employees or the adopters of innovation into large categories based on the fact that certain individuals are more flexible towards technological change in the organization whereas some are not. The different stages of the adapters to technology change at workplace are as follows: Innovators- These are the group of people who are the strongest and the most easily adaptable to any technological innovation that takes place in an organization (Frey Osborne, 2015). They are the ones who often tend to propose the give idea and find ways to ensure that the company has been able to start with the given technological change procedure. As per my observation, the innovator in our given organization was the owner who had proposed the given change. Early Adopters- The early adopters are the people who are opinionated but understand that technological up gradation and change forms an essential part of an organization. In the given company, I observed that there were no early adopters. The people were not happy with the change and decided to resist it. Early Majority-After some resistance, a particular group of employees emerged who decide to embrace the change in a graceful manner. They began to show interest in the given technological up gradation and started learning it. The early majority people are the group of people who tend to observe the given change and adapt it faster than the other people. Late Majority- These are a group of skeptic people who only start performing or adapting to change when the majority of the people in the organization start doing so. Most of the employees often fall to this category. These set of employees often resist to change and then they see to it that the change which has been made in the given context relates everyone first and then they adopt it. As per my observation in the organization, 80% of the employees fall to this category. This group of employees only began to change their ways when they observed that others were changing too. Therefore, from the analysis made it could be analyzed that the organization faced certain problems while adapting to the technological change in the organization. Hence, to make the technological change phase smoother, the following has been suggested: Conduct training and analysis- The Company needs to conduct proper training and analysis which will then go a long way in helping the employees to adapt to the given change in the market. According to me, ABC Limited did not indulge in any training and development which caused further resistance among the employees. Identification of loopholes- The loopholes that exist in an organization need to be identified at an early stage. This shall help in making the organization understand where the focus of the organization lies. Selecting the right kind of technology-The right kind of technological update is the main essence of the organization. ABC limited could have started updating its technology with respect to just one organization but instead it engaged in the change of all the processes which according to me was incorrect (Galegher, Kraut, Egido, 2014). Gaining acceptance- It needs to involve the employees in the decision making process in order to ensure that the employees di not reflect resistance during the change process. Provide incentives- providing the employees incentives is an optimum way of ensuring that the employees are willing to adapt to the technological change. Conclusion Therefore from the given analysis it could be observed that an organization is a storehouse of activities and the employees form the primary essence of the organization. It is every important for the organization to ensure that the employees are happy and are working adequately in order to see to it that the organization is able to achieve its goals and objectives in the right manger. The first part of the essay throws light on the Team work aspect. It relates to the concept of team work and then describes a personal experience based on the concept. The theory of group development has been employed in order to understand the various stages where the team I was assigned to lagged. The second part of the essay discusses the Technology at workplace aspect and discusses my personal experience when I was interning at an organization. The Rogers model has been applied to the given scenario. References Buckingham, M., Goodall, A. (2015). Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review , 93(4), 40-50. Cascio, W. (2018). Managing human resource. McGraw-Hill Education. Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, employment and society , 28(4), 589-610. DePasse, J., Lee, P. ( 2013). A model for reverse innovation in health care. Globalization and health , 9(1),, 40. Duffy, T., Jonassen, D. e. ( 2013.). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Routledge. Frey, C., Osborne, M. (2015). Technology at work: The future of innovation and employment. Citi GPS. Galegher, J., Kraut, R., Egido, C. (2014). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Psychology Press. Grint, K., Woolgar, S. (2013). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. . John Wiley Sons. . Islam, T. (2014). Household level innovation diffusion model of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells from stated preference data. Energy Policy , 65, 340-350. Joshi, A., Knight, A. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal , 58(1), 59-84. Kaplan, S., LaPort, K., Waller, M. ( 2013). The role of positive affectivity in team effectiveness during crises. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 473-491. Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L.D., Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review.Journal of Engineering Education,102(4), pp.472-512. Doyle, G.J., Garrett, B. Currie, L.M. (2014). Integrating mobile devices into nursing curricula: Opportunities for implementation using Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation model.Nurse education today,34(5), pp.775-782. Driedonks, B.A., Gevers, J.M. van Weele, A.J. (2014). Success factors for sourcing teams: How to foster sourcing team effectiveness.European Management Journal,32(2), pp.288-304. Kilpatrick, K., Lavoie?Tremblay, M., Lamothe, L., Ritchie, J.A. Doran, D. (2013). Conceptual framework of acute care nurse practitioner role enactment, boundary work, and perceptions of team effectiveness.Journal of advanced nursing,69(1), pp.205-217. Mahembe, B. Engelbrecht, A.S. (2013). The relationship between servant leadership, affective team commitment and team effectiveness.SA Journal of Human Resource Management,11(1), pp.1-10 Mone, E.M. London, M. (2014).Employee engagement through effective performance management: A practical guide for managers. Routledge. Pangil, F. Moi Chan, J. (2014). The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness.Journal of Knowledge Management,18(1), pp.92-106. Pulakos, E.D., Hanson, R.M., Arad, S. Moye, N. (2015). Performance management can be fixed: An on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change.Industrial and Organizational Psychology,8(1), pp.51-76. Shih, S.P., Jiang, J.J., Klein, G. Wang, E. (2013). Job burnout of the information technology worker: Work exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment.Information Management,50(7), pp.582-589. Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. Halligan, J. (2015).Performance management in the public sector. Routledge. Vuki?, V.B., Bach, M.P. Popovi?, A. (2013). Supporting performance management with business process management and business intelligence: A case analysis of integration and orchestration.International journal of information management,33(4), pp.613-619. Wang, D., Waldman, D.A. Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness.Journal of applied psychology,99(2), p.181.